Skin antiseptic choice to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections
Abstract
Background The use of vascular access devices (VADs) may put patients at risk for bloodstream infections. Despite infection control prevention methods used in our neonatal unit, mean catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) rates are quite high. One contributing factor for these high infection rates may be the skin antiseptic preparation procedure undertaken prior to intravenous line insertion.
Objectives We aimed to reduce CRBRBSI rates by changing to octenidine hydrochloride antiseptic solutions for skin preparation in the neonatal unit at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.
Methods Antiseptics for skin preparation were changed from povidone-iodine or alcohol to octenidine hydrochloride from September to November 2010. Bloodstream infection rates and hand hygiene compliance were recorded and compared before and during the study.
Results The mean CRBRBSI rate in the neonatal unit before changing the skin antiseptic solution (January – August 2010) was 11.68‰ (‰ means per 1000 patient-days). During the study, CRBSI rates decreased significantly to 1.1‰ in the first month, increased to 8.7‰ in the second month, and decreased to 2.4‰ in the third month. Hand hygiene compliance for 1 moment (before aseptic task) fluctuated, reaching 93.8% and 100% before and during the study, respectively. Compliance for the remaining 4 moments of hand hygiene as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), ranged from 33.0 – 87.3% before the study and 8.0 – 100.0% during the study. The most striking decrease in these 4 moments of hand hygiene compliance in the second month was accompanied by a marked increase in CRB SI rate.
Conclusions Reduced CRB SI rates cannot be attained by solely changing antiseptic solutions for skin preparation. Maintaining other prevention strategies, such as adhering to the 5 moments of hand hygiene recommended by WHO is also very important.
References
2. Center for Disease Control. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) event. [cited 2011 May 11]. [about 8 screens]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscmanual/4PSC_CLABScurrent.pdf
3. O O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Pediatrics. 2002;110:e51.
4. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger P, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2011. [cited 2011 May 11]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-2011.pdf
5. Dettenkofer M, Jonas D, Wiechmann C, Rossner R, Frank U, Zentner J, et al. Effect of skin disinfection with octenidine dihydrochloride on insertion site colonization of intravascular catheters. Infection. 2002;30:282-5.
6. Darmstadt GL, Hossain MMMM, Choi Y, Shirin M, Mullany LC, Islam M, et al. Safety and effect of chlorhexidine skin cleansing on skin flora of neonates in Bangladesh. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:492-5.
7. M Moore D, Johnston L, Henderson E, John M, Langley J, Suh K, et al. Central venous catheter-associated blood stream infections in intensive care units and in recipients of haematopoeietic stem cell transplants. [cited 2011 May 11]. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/nois-sinp/projects/pdf/vc_protocol_e.pdf
8. Goede MR, Coopersmith CM. Catheter-related bloodstream infection. Surg Clin N Am. 2009;89:463-74.
9. Heeg P. Nosocomial infections in newborn nurseries and neonatal intensive care units. Int J Infect Control. 2006;2:1.
10. Cooley K, Grady S. Minimizing catheter-related bloodstream infections: one unit’s approach. Adv Neonatal Care. 2009;9:209-26.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Accepted 2016-10-11
Published 2011-12-31