Knee height and knee height/height ratio of healthy schoolchildren

Main Article Content

Annang Giri Moelyo
Andre Christiawan Susanto
Bella Monika Rajagukguk
Jonathan Billy Christian Tjiayadi


Background Knee height (KH) is rarely used to estimate stature in children, although its measurement might have benefit because not influenced by some musculoskeletal disorder in spinal region. Knee height and knee height/height ratio are typical in children due to different in pubertal timing of each child.

Objective To derive a formula to estimate body height using knee height and to analyze the patterns of knee height and knee height/height ratio of healthy schoolchildren.

Methods This cross-sectional study involved healthy children in one elementary school and one junior high school in Surakarta, Central Java. Demographic data were collected (sex, age, and ethnicity). All anthropometric measurements (height, weight, sitting height, and knee height) were taken three times, and their means were calculated. Linear regression analysis was used to compare height from knee height and sitting height. Non-parametric analysis through locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) was used to analyze the growth patterns of knee height, knee height/height ratio, and sitting height/height ratio.

Results There were 633 children (328 boys and 305 girls) in this study. The formulas for the estimation of height were as follows: for boys, 2.40 × KH (cm) + 1.36 × age (years) + 20.31; and for girls, 2.48 × KH (cm) + 1.15 × age (years) + 19.58 (adjusted R2=0.97). Knee height increased earlier than sitting height in both boys and girls during childhood to adolescent period. Boys had a longer period of knee height increment than girls.

Conclusion Knee height may be a useful alternative to estimate height in children. Knee height increases faster than height and sitting height in both boys and girls.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moelyo A, Susanto A, Rajagukguk B, Tjiayadi J. Knee height and knee height/height ratio of healthy schoolchildren. PI [Internet]. 29Jul.2020 [cited 27Oct.2020];60(5):233-. Available from:
Pediatric Endocrinology
Received 2020-02-24
Accepted 2020-07-29
Published 2020-07-29


Bogin B, Varela-Silva MI. Leg length, body proportion, and health: A review with a note on beauty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:1047-75. DOI: 0.3390/ijerph7031047.
2. Fogal AS, Franceschini Sdo C, Priore SE, Cotta RMM, Ribeiro AQ. Stature es-timation using the knee height measurement amongst Brazilian elderly. Nutr Hosp. 2014;31:829-34. DOI:10.3305/nh.2015.31.2.7618.
3. Berger MM, Cayeux M, Schaller M, Chiole L, Soguel L, Piazza G, et al. Stature estimation using the knee height determination in critically ill patients. e-SPEN. 2008;3:84-8. DOI:10.1016/j.eclnm.2008.01.004.
4. Fatmah F. The equation of prediction stature based on age and ethnic in six institutionalized elderly at DKI Jakarta and Tangerang, Year 2005. Makara J Health Res. 2006;10:7-16.
5. Yanto, Lu CW, Lu JM. Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for el-ementary school furniture based on children’s anthropometry. Appl Ergon. 2017;62:168-81. DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.004.
6. Hermanussen M. Knemometry. In: Hermanussen M, editor. Auxology. 1st ed. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart; 2013. p. 168-73. DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.004.
7. Bogin B, Varela-Silva I. Body proportion in relation to health. In: Hermanussen M, editor. Auxology: Studying human growth and development. 1st ed. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart Sche Vlgsb.; 2013. p. 113.
8. Moelyo AG, Yogasatria L, Setyawan YA, Rokhayati E. Sitting height, sitting height/height ratio, arm span, and arm span-height differences of healthy adoles-cents. Paediatr Indones. 2018;58:138-45. DOI: 10.14238/pi58.3.2018.138-45.
9. Zhang YQ, Li H. Reference charts of sitting height, leg length and body pro-portions for Chinese children aged 0-18 years. Ann Hum Biol. 2015;42:223-30. DOI:10.3109/03014460.2014.934283.
10. Preece MA, Baines MJ. A new family of mathematical models describing the hu-man growth curve. Ann Hum Biol. 1978;5:1-24. DOI: 10.1080/03014467800002601.
11. Zemel BS, Johnston FE. Application of the Preece-Baines growth model to cross-sectional data: problems of validity and interpretation. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6:563-70. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.1310060504.