The effect of soybean formula and formula 100 supplementation on the growth of preschool children
Keywords:
soybean formula, formula 100, growth, preschool children
Abstract
Background Preschool children are vulnerable in growth. Soy-bean formula (SF) and formula-100 (F100) are supplementary foods
which contain of high energy and are available at low price; how-
ever, they are not widely used for preschool children.
Objectives To investigate the effect of SF compared to F100 on
the growth of preschool children.
Methods A cross-over trial was conducted on 96 preschool chil-
dren aged 4-7 years. Subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups
which received 200 ml soybean formula (n=49) or F100 (n=47) for
1 month and crossed-over after a six-week wash-out period. Body
weight was measured weekly. Body height and food analysis by 3-
day food recall were measured at the beginning and the end of the
study. The criteria of the acceptability of the formula was either
good or poor.
Results Supplementation with SF as well as F100 induced catch
up growth as shown by the increase of Δz-score. There were no
significant difference of Δ weight for age z-score, Δ height for age
z-score, and Δ weight for height z score between groups during
the first and second phases of the trial. The acceptability of F100
was significantly better than that of SF at the beginning; neverthe-
less, the difference was not significant at the second phase trial.
Conclusions Soybean formula and F100 given for a one month
period can induce catch-up growth in preschool children. Soybean
formula as an alternative health food can be accepted by preschool
children
References
1. Rivera JA, Habicht JP. Effect of supplementary feeding
on the prevention of mild-to-moderate wasting in con-
ditions of endemic malnutrition in Guatemala. Bulle-
tin of the WHO 2002;80:926-32.
2. Wang Y, Monteiro C, Papkin B M. Trends of obesity
and underweight in older children and adolescens in
United States, Brazil, China and Russia. Am J Clin
Nutr 2002;75:971-2.
3. De Onis M, Frongillo EA, Blossner M. Is malnutrition
declining? An analysis of changes in levels of child mal-
nutrition since 1980. Bulletin of the WHO 2000;78:1222-
33.
4. Hägg A, Jacobson T, Nordlund G, Rössner S. Effects
of milk or water on lunch intake in preschool children.
J Appetite 1998;31:83-92.
5. WHO. Complementary feeding of young children in
developing countries: A review of current scientific
knowledge. Geneva; 1998.
6. Fiore P, Castagnola E, Merolla R. Effect of nutritional
intervention on physical growth in children at risk of
malnutrition. Int Ped 2002;17:179-83.
7. Businco L, Bruno G, Giampietro PG. Soy protein for
the prevention and treatment of children with cow-
milk allergy. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68(Suppl):1447S-
52S.
8. Endres J, Barter S, Theodora P, Welch P. Soy-enhanced
lunch acceptance by preschoolers. J Am Diet Assoc
2003;103:346-51.
9. Klish WJ. Soy protein-based formulas: Recommenda-
tion for use in infant feeding. Am Acad Ped 1998;102:
148-53.
10. WHO. Management of severe malnutrition: A manual
for physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva;
1999.
11. WHO. Introduction: Management of severe malnu-
trition. Geneva; 2000.
12. Krähenb ü hl JD, Schutz Y, Jëquier E. High fat versus
high carbohydrate nutritional supplementation: A one
year trial in stunted rural Gambian children. Eur J Clin
Nutr 1998;50:213-22.
13. Fisberg M, Maulén-Radován IE, Tormo R, Carrascoso
MT, Giner CP, Martin FA, et al. Effect of oral nutri-
tional supplementation with or without synbiotics on
sickness and catch-up growth in preschool children.
Int Pediatr 2002;17:216-22.
14. Salehi M, Kimiagar SM, Shahbazi M, Mehrabi Y, Kolahi
AA. Assessing the impact of nutrition education on
growth indices of Iranian nomadic children: An appli-
cation of modified beliefs, attitudes, subjective-norms,
and enabling-factors model. Br J Nutr 2004;91:779-
87.
15. Mahan LK, Arlin MT. Krause’s food, nutrition, and
diet therapy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.;
1992. p. 64-9.
16. Prawirohartono EP. Nutrien dan angka kecukupan gizi
yang dianjurkan. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: BP-FK UGM; 1997.
p. 1-19.
17. Tome D, Bos C. Dietary protein and nitrogen utiliza-
tion. J Nutr 2000;130:1868S-73S.
18. Skinner JD, Ziegler P, Ponza M. Transitions in infants’
and toddlers’ beverage patterns. J Am Diet Assoc
2004;104:S45-50.
on the prevention of mild-to-moderate wasting in con-
ditions of endemic malnutrition in Guatemala. Bulle-
tin of the WHO 2002;80:926-32.
2. Wang Y, Monteiro C, Papkin B M. Trends of obesity
and underweight in older children and adolescens in
United States, Brazil, China and Russia. Am J Clin
Nutr 2002;75:971-2.
3. De Onis M, Frongillo EA, Blossner M. Is malnutrition
declining? An analysis of changes in levels of child mal-
nutrition since 1980. Bulletin of the WHO 2000;78:1222-
33.
4. Hägg A, Jacobson T, Nordlund G, Rössner S. Effects
of milk or water on lunch intake in preschool children.
J Appetite 1998;31:83-92.
5. WHO. Complementary feeding of young children in
developing countries: A review of current scientific
knowledge. Geneva; 1998.
6. Fiore P, Castagnola E, Merolla R. Effect of nutritional
intervention on physical growth in children at risk of
malnutrition. Int Ped 2002;17:179-83.
7. Businco L, Bruno G, Giampietro PG. Soy protein for
the prevention and treatment of children with cow-
milk allergy. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68(Suppl):1447S-
52S.
8. Endres J, Barter S, Theodora P, Welch P. Soy-enhanced
lunch acceptance by preschoolers. J Am Diet Assoc
2003;103:346-51.
9. Klish WJ. Soy protein-based formulas: Recommenda-
tion for use in infant feeding. Am Acad Ped 1998;102:
148-53.
10. WHO. Management of severe malnutrition: A manual
for physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva;
1999.
11. WHO. Introduction: Management of severe malnu-
trition. Geneva; 2000.
12. Krähenb ü hl JD, Schutz Y, Jëquier E. High fat versus
high carbohydrate nutritional supplementation: A one
year trial in stunted rural Gambian children. Eur J Clin
Nutr 1998;50:213-22.
13. Fisberg M, Maulén-Radován IE, Tormo R, Carrascoso
MT, Giner CP, Martin FA, et al. Effect of oral nutri-
tional supplementation with or without synbiotics on
sickness and catch-up growth in preschool children.
Int Pediatr 2002;17:216-22.
14. Salehi M, Kimiagar SM, Shahbazi M, Mehrabi Y, Kolahi
AA. Assessing the impact of nutrition education on
growth indices of Iranian nomadic children: An appli-
cation of modified beliefs, attitudes, subjective-norms,
and enabling-factors model. Br J Nutr 2004;91:779-
87.
15. Mahan LK, Arlin MT. Krause’s food, nutrition, and
diet therapy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.;
1992. p. 64-9.
16. Prawirohartono EP. Nutrien dan angka kecukupan gizi
yang dianjurkan. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: BP-FK UGM; 1997.
p. 1-19.
17. Tome D, Bos C. Dietary protein and nitrogen utiliza-
tion. J Nutr 2000;130:1868S-73S.
18. Skinner JD, Ziegler P, Ponza M. Transitions in infants’
and toddlers’ beverage patterns. J Am Diet Assoc
2004;104:S45-50.
Published
2016-10-13
How to Cite
1.
Mexitalia M, Nugroho Y, Susanto J. The effect of soybean formula and formula 100 supplementation on the growth of preschool children. PI [Internet]. 13Oct.2016 [cited 13Nov.2024];45(6):256-3. Available from: https://paediatricaindonesiana.org/index.php/paediatrica-indonesiana/article/view/883
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Received 2016-10-12
Accepted 2016-10-12
Published 2016-10-13
Accepted 2016-10-12
Published 2016-10-13
