Knowledge, attitude, and practice of underfive children stimulation of working and nonworking mothers
Abstract
Objective To assess and compare knowledge, attitude, and prac-tice of underfive children stimulation of working and nonworking
mothers and to determine the correlation between knowledge, at-
titude, practice of stimulation and mothers’ ages, educational level,
number of children, and number of underfive children.
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in PT. Indofood
Sukses Makmur, Tanjung Morawa, Medan from October 2002 un-
til November 2002. Respondents were female workers having
underfive children assigned as working mothers and wives of male
workers (with similar inclusion criteria) assigned as nonworking
mothers. Selected respondents were interviewed using a struc-
tured questionnaire. Sample size for each group was 58. Knowl-
edge, attitude, and practice of stimulation were classified as good,
less, and poor.
Results There were 131 mothers interviewed. There were no sig-
nificant differences in the ages, educational level, number of chil-
dren, and number of underfive children. Good knowledge of stimu-
lation of the working and nonworking mothers were 64.6% and
97%, respectively; good attitude toward stimulation were 95.4%
and 27.3%, respectively, while good practice of stimulation were
58.5% and 22.7%, respectively. These differences were statisti-
cally significant.
Conclusion There were significant differences in knowledge, atti-
tude, and practice of underfive children stimulation between work-
ing and nonworking mothers. The knowledge of stimulation of the
working mothers was worse than that of the nonworking mothers
and the attitude and practice of the working mothers were better
than those of the nonworking mothers
References
metode Denver II. In: Sularyo TS, Musa DA, Gunardi
H, editors. Deteksi dan intervensi dini penyimpangan
tumbuh kembang anak dalam upaya optimalisasi
kualitas sumber daya manusia. PKB IKA XXXVII FK
UI. Jakarta: 1996.
2. Soetjiningsih. Tumbuh kembang anak. Jakarta: EGC;
1998. p. 1-94.
3. Field TM, Schanberg SM, Scafidi F, Bauer CR, Vega-
Lahr N, Garcia R, et al. Tactile/kinesthetic stimulation
effects on preterm neonates. AAP 1986;77:654-8.
4. Weisglas-Kuperus N, Baerts W, Smrkovsky M, Sauer PJ.
Effects of biological and social factors on the cognitive
development of very low birth weight children. The
American Academy of Pediatrics 1993;92:658-65.
5. Sularyo TS. Pentingnya stimulasi mental dini. One
day Seminar dan Training on Pencatatan
Pemantauan Tumbuh Kembang Balita; 1993 Feb 8;
Jakarta, Indonesia.
6. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil
kesehatan Indonesia 2000. Jakarta: Depkes RI; 2001.
p. 11.
7. Badan Pusat Statistik. Indikator sosial wanita Indone-
sia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; 1999.
8. Marpaung U. Hubungan pengetahuan dan perilaku ibu
tentang stimulasi dengan perkembangan bayinya di
daerah kumuh kelurahan Pulogadung Jakarta. [thesis].
Jakarta: BP FK UI; 1999.
9. Notoatmodjo S. Prinsip-prinsip dasar ilmu kesehatan
masyarakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 1997. p. 95-133.
10. Lubis IZ, Lubis M, Loebis MS, Manoeroeng SM, Lubis
CP. Pengetahuan, sikap dan perilaku orangtua tentang
imunisasi. Majalah Kedokteran Nusantara 1990;1:1-11
11. American academy of pediatrics. Care of adolescent par-
ents and their children (RE0020). Pediatrics 2001;107:
429-34.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Accepted 2016-09-29
Published 2016-10-10