Tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient to diagnose pulmonary hypertension: a diagnostic accuracy study

  • Indah Kartika Murni https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-9180
  • Emmanuel Mareffcita Siagian
  • Nurnaningsih Nurnaningsih Dr Sardjito Hospital/Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Nadya Arafuri Dr Sardjito Hospital/Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: pulmonary hypertension; heart catheterization; tricuspid regurgitation; echocardiography

Abstract

Background Pulmonary hypertension carries significant morbidity and mortality in children. Early diagnosis and management may improve outcomes in children with pulmonary hypertension. Heart catheterization, a gold standard for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension, is an invasive procedure and not widely available. Echocardiography can be used as an alternative diagnostic tool for pulmonary hypertension.

Objective To determine the diagnostic value of tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient on echocardiography compared to heart catheterization to diagnose pulmonary hypertension in children.

Methods This diagnostic test study was done with medical record data of children with acyanotic congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization and echocardiography procedures from January 2018 to December 2020 at Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Data were analyzed to obtain sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios.

Results A total of 98 children with acyanotic congenital heart disease were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient to determine pulmonary artery pressure compared to heart catheterization were 64.4% and 54.5%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 1.42. The pre-test and post-test probability of this study were 88.7% and 91.7%, respectively.

Conclusion Tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient measured using echocardiography has poor sensitivity and specificity to diagnose pulmonary hypertension.

References

1. Murni IK, Wirawan MT, Patmasari L, Sativa ER, Arafuri N, Nugroho S, et al. Delayed diagnosis in children with congenital heart disease: a mixed-method study. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02667-3.
2. Rosenzweig EB, Abman SH, Adatia I, Beghetti M, Bonnet D, Haworth S, et al. Paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: updates on definition, classification, diagnostics and management. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2019;53:1801916. DOI:10.1183/13993003.01916-2018
3. Arafuri N, Murni IK, Idris NS, Uiterwaal CSP, Savitri AI, Nugroho S, Noormanto N. Survival of left-to-right shunts repair with pulmonary arterial hypertension in children at a tertiary hospital in a low to-middle income country. Glob Hear Rev. 2020;16:25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/GH.831.
4. Hopper RK, Abman SH, Ivy DD. Persistent challenges in pediatric pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2016;150:226–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.007.
5. Gille J, Seyfarth HJ, Gerlach S, Malcharek M, Czeslick E, Sablotzki A. Perioperative anesthesiological management of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:356282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/356982.
6. Frost A, Badesch D, Gibbs JSR, Gopalan D, Khanna D, Manes A, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1801904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01904-2018.
7. Park MK, Salamat M. Park's?: pediatric cardiology for Practitioners. 7th edition. Philadephia: Eselvier Saunder; 2020. ISBN: 9780323681070
8. Hansmann G, Koestenberger M, Alastalo TP, Apitz C, Austin ED, Bonnet D, et al. 2019 updated consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric pulmonary hypertension: The European Pediatric Pulmonary Vascular Disease Network (EPPVDN), endorsed by AEPC, ESPR and ISHLT. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:879–901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2019.06.022.
9. Ullah W, Minalyan A, Saleem S, Nadeem N, Abdullah HM, Abdalla A, et al. Comparative accuracy of non-invasive imaging versus right heart catheterization for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020;29:100568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100568
10. Janda S, Shahidi N, Gin K, Swiston J. Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2011;97:612–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.212084.
11. D’Alto M, Bossone E, Opotowsky AR, Ghio S, Rudski LG, Naeije R. Strengths and weaknesses of echocardiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2018;263:177–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.024
12. Dimopoulos K, Condliffe R, Tulloh RMR, Clift P, Alonso-Gonzalez R, Bedair R, et al. Echocardiographic screening for pulmonary hypertension in congenital heart disease: jacc review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2778–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2201.
13. Mutlak D, Aronson D, Lessick J, Reisner SA, Dabbah S, Agmon Y. Functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients with pulmonary hypertension: Is pulmonary artery pressure the only determinant of regurgitation severity? Chest. 2009;135:115–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0277.
Published
2022-12-05
How to Cite
1.
Murni I, Siagian E, Nurnaningsih N, Arafuri N. Tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient to diagnose pulmonary hypertension: a diagnostic accuracy study. PI [Internet]. 5Dec.2022 [cited 29Jan.2023];62(6):367-2. Available from: https://paediatricaindonesiana.org/index.php/paediatrica-indonesiana/article/view/2718
Section
Pediatric Cardiology
Received 2021-07-11
Accepted 2022-12-05
Published 2022-12-05