Visual acuity assessment of preschool children in the inner city area in Jakarta
Abstract
Background Visual acuity (VA) assessment is an important ocular examination to identify children with vision problems. Such early identification allows for early intervention to prevent childhood blindness.
Objective To describe and compare visual acuity measurements in preschool children using two different visual acuity charts.
Methods This cross-sectional study in children aged 36-60 months was done in a low-income area in the Central Jakarta District as a collaboration between Department of Ophthalmology and Department of Child Health, Universitas Indonesia Medical
School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. All children underwent visual acuity examinations using Lea symbols and Tumbling E charts. The VA results from two charts were analyzed with Bland-Altman plot for limits of agreement. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the differences between vision charts.
Results A total of 113 children enrolled, but only 38 children completed the examinations. The mean age of subjects was 50.5 (SD 6.4) months. Overall, subjects’ mean VA was 0.29 (SD 0.18) for Lea symbols and 0.37 (SD 0.14) for Tumbling E. The mean difference of VA between Lea symbols and Tumbling E was 0.07 (SD 0.22) logMAR units, with upper and lower limits of agreement at 0.36 and 0.51, respectively. There was no statistical difference in VA score using Lea symbols and Tumbling-E based on gender and age.
Conclusion Most preschool children in our study have normal visual acuity. Lea symbols and Tumbling E chart are comparable and can be used to efficiently measure VA in preschool children.
References
2. Inal A, Ocak OB, Aygit ED, Yilmaz I, Inal B, Taskapili M, et al. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1385–91. DOI:10.1007/s10792-017-0596-1.
3. Paul CM, Sathyan S. Comparison of the efficacy of Lea Symbol chart and Sheridan Gardiner chart for preschool vision screening. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66:924–8. DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1078_17.
4. Engin O, Despriet DDG, van der Meulen-Schot HM, Romers A, Slot X, Sang MTF, et al. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:2013–20. DOI:10.1007/s00417-014-2763-7.
5. Wright K, Spiegel P. Pediatric opthalmology and strabismus. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2012.
6. Bell AL, Rodes ME, Kellar LC. Childhood eye examination. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88:241–8.
7. Pan Y, et al. Visual Acuity Norms in Preschool Children: The Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 June ; 86(6): 607–61. DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a76e55
8. Bailey IL, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic. Vision Res. 2013;90:2–9. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.004.
9. Vision in Preschoolers Study Group. Preschool visual acuity screening with HOTV and Lea symbols: testability and between-test agreement. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:678–83. DOI:10.1097/01.opx.0000144746.80718.67.
10. Vivekanand U, Gonsalves S, Bhat SS. Is LEA symbol better compared to Snellen chart for visual acuity assessment in preschool children? Rom J Ophthalmol. 2019;63:35–7.
11. Dobson V, Maguire M, Orel-Bixler D, Quinn G, Ying GS. Visual acuity results in school-aged children and adults: Lea Symbols chart versus Bailey-Lovie chart. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:650–4. DOI:10.1097/00006324-200309000-00010.
12. Becker R, Hübsch S, Gräf MH, Kaufmann H. Examination of young children with Lea symbols. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:513–6. DOI:10.1136/bjo.86.5.513.
13. Moganeswari D, Thomas J, Srinivasan K, Jacob GP. Test re-test reliability and validity of different visual acuity and stereoacuity charts used in preschool children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:NC01-5. DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2015/14407.6747.
14. Sanker N, Dhirani S, Bhakat P. Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20:345–8. DOI:10.4103/0974-9233.120020.
15. Thomas B, Umapathy E, Iputo J. Effects of nutritional deficiency on visual acuity. J Biol Sci. 2008;8:1246-50. DOI:10.3923/jbs.2008.1246.1250.
Copyright (c) 2021 Dian Estu Yulia, Yulinda Arty Laksmita, Julie Dewi Barliana, Laura Agnestasia Djunaedi, Lia Amanda, Hartono Gunardi, Prof
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2021-11-23
Published 2021-11-23
