Penile length of newborns and children in Surakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Background Penile length is a factor for assessing abnormalities in
external genitalia. To diagnose micropenis, a condition in which
penile length is < - 2.5 standard deviations (SD), a reference is
required for diagnosis. Age and race/ethnic groups are factors
that contribute to normal penile length. To date, Indon esia does
not have such a reference for normal penile length in newborns
and children.
Objective To assess normal penile length in newborns and children
in Surakarta, Central Java, in which the majority population is
ofJavanese ethnicity.
Methods We studied male newborns and children who were
patients in Moewardi Hospital from January 2011 to January
2012. We included males aged 0-18 years whose parents provided
informed consent. We excluded children with undescended
testis, hypospadia, ambiguous genitalia, con genital anomalies,
or syndromes (such as Down syndrome). For penile len gth
measurements, we stretched the flaccid penis, depressed the
pubic fat and placed a wooden spatula vertically along the dorsal
penis. The penile length was measured from the penile base
to the tip of the glans excluding the prepuce. Measurements
were performed three times and a mean value was calculated
for each subject.
Results Of the 300 subjects, 100 were newborns and 200 were
children aged 1 month - 18 years. Two hundred ninety-six subjects
(98.7%) were Javanese. The mean penile lengths of preterm
(gestational age 30-36 weeks) and term (gestational age > 36
weeks) newborns were 1.88 (SD 0.14) cm and 2.3 7 (SD 0.26) cm,
respectively. The mean penile lengths by age groupings were as
follows: 0-<6 months, 2.67 (SD 0.58) cm; 6- < 12 months, 2.67
(SD 0.58) cm; 1- <3 years, 2.80 (SD 0.84) cm; 3-<5 years, 3 .50
(SD 0.55) cm; 5- <7 years, 3 .50 (SD 0.71) cm; 7-<9 years, 3 .85
(SD 0.53 ) cm; 9-<ll years, 4.50 (SD 0.71) cm; 11-< 13 years,
4.63 (SD 1.13) cm; 13-< 15 years, 5.53 (SD 1.45) cm; and 15-18
years, 6.16 (SD 1.19) cm.
Conclusion Normal penile length in boys in Surakarta is smaller
than the normal range reference currently in use.
References
concern. Adolesc Med. 2002; 13 :171-80.
2. Son H, Lee H, Huh JS, Kim SW, Paick JS. Studies on selfesteem
of penile size in young Korean military men. Asian J
Androl. 2003;5: 185- 9.
3. Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, Muir GH, Natali
A, Caldarera E, et al. Penile length is normal in most men
seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res.
2002; 14:283- 6.
4. Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA; Lawson Wilkins
Pediatric Endocrine Society/European Society for Paediatric
Endocrinology Consensus Group. Consensus statement
on management of intersex disorders. J Pediatr Urol.
2006;2:148--62.
5. Anthony E, Baratz AB, Boney C, Brown DR, Byne W,
Cameron D, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of
disorders of sex development in childhood. l" edition. New
Jersey: Accord Alliance; 2006. p. 2. Available from: www.
dsdguidelines .org
6. Sutan-Assin M, Rukman J, Dahlan A. Penile dimensions of newborn infants. Paediatr Indones. 1989;29:146-50.
7. Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW. Normal growth and variation
in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol.
l 942;48:759.
8. Ting TH, Wu LL. Penile length of term newborn infants in
multiracial Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2009;50:817-21.
9. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in
Singapore. J Pediatr Endocrinolo Metab. 2000;13:55--62.
10. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full
term newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J.
2002;23:314-6.
11. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,
Beyazova U. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional
study of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years.
Urology. 2007;70:572-5.
12. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis
vary according to ethnicity? Horm Res. 2001 ;55:278-81.
13. Tuladhar R, Davis PG, Batch J, Doyle L W. Establishment of
a normal range of penile length in pre term infants. J Paediatr
Child Health. 1998;34:471-3.
14. Menon PS, Khatwa UA. The child with micropenis. Indian
J Pediatr. 2000;67:455--60.
15. Wang CH, Lin WD, Bau DT, Tsai CH, Liu DC, Tsai FJ. Penile
length of normal boys in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan.
2006;47:293- 6.
16. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Damiao R, Silva EA. Penile
anthropometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J
Pediatr. 2007;83:441- 6.
17. Mehraban D, Salehi M, Zayeri F. Penile size and somatometric
parameters among Iranian normal adult men. IntJ Impot Res .
2007;19:303- 9.
18. Soylemez H, Atar M, Sancaktutar M, Penbegtil N, Bozkurt Y,
Onem K. Relationship between penile size and somatometric
parameters in 2276 healthy young men. Int J Impot Res.
2012;24: 126-9.
19. Asian Y, Atan A, Omur Aydm A, Nal~ac10glu V, Tuncel A,
Kad1oglu A. Penile length and somatometric parameters:
a study in h ealthy young Turkish men. Asian J Androl.
2011;13:339-41.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Accepted 2016-08-18
Published 2013-04-30