Sensitivity and Specificity of Electrocardiographic Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Children with Rheumatic Heart Disease

  • Sudigdo Sastroasmoro Department of Child Health, Universitas Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Bambang Madiyono Department of Child Health, Universitas Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Ismet N. Oesman Department of Child Health, Universitas Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
Keywords: electrocardiographic; left ventricular hypertrophy; rheumatic heart disease

Abstract

Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (L VH) were examined in 84 unselected pediatric patients with rheumatic heart disease. There were 47 male and 3 7 female patients, ranging in age from 6 to 19 years. Electrocardiographic L VH was detected m 41 patients (48.8%), i.e. in 55.3% (26/47) of boys and in 36.6% (15/41) of girls. Echocardiographically determined L VH was present in 42 cases (50%) if left ventricular mass (L VM) was indexed for height, or 47 cases (56%) if L VM was indexed for body surface area (BSA). The overall sensitivity of height-indexed electrocardiographic diagnosis of LVH was 71.4% (95% confidence interval= 57.7% to 85.1%), while its sensitivity was 73.8% (95% confidence interval= 60.0% to 87.0%). For BSA indexed echocardiographic LVH, the sensitivity was 68.1% (95% confidence interval = 54.8 to 81.4%) and the specificity was 75.7% (95% confidence interval = 61.9% to 89.5%). When sex-adjustment was examined, there was no increase of sensitivity of electrocardiographic LVH. Sensitivity of the electrocardiogram for LVH increased when age-adjustment was examined with 13 years of age as a cut-off point, both for height indexed and BSA-indexed echocardiographic LVH. Reasons/or the difference between these findings and the findings in adult patients (remarkably low sensitivity and very high specificity of ECG L VH) were discussed. Electrocardiogram was a moderate diagnostic modality in the detection of L VH in our pediatric patients with rheumatic heart disease. Sex did not influence the sensitivity of ECG L VH, but older age group tended to increase its sensitivity.

References

1. KAPLAN S.: Chronic rheumatic heart disease, in Adams FH, Emmanouilides GC (Eds), Heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, 3rd ed. Baltimore and London: Williams & Wilkins, 1983: 552.
2. MARKOWITZ M, GORDIS L.: Rheumatic fever, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1972.
3. MADIYONO B, SIREGAR AA, OESMAN IN SASTROASMORO S.: Profile of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in the Department' of Child Health, Medical School, University of Indonesia/Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta ( 1984-1989). Presented at the 8th National Congress of Pediatrics, Ujung Pandang 1990.
4. REICHEK N, DEVEREUX RB.: Left ventricular hypertrophy: relationship of anatomic, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings. Circulation 1981; 63: 1391-1396.
5. LEVY D, SAVAGE DD, GARRISON R, ANDERSON KM, KANNEL WB, CASTELLI WP.: Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol 19~7; 59: 956-60.
6. LEVY 0, ANDERSON KM, SAVAGE DD, KANNEL WB, CHRISTIANSEN JC, CASTELLI WP.: Ecbocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: Prevalence and risk factors. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 7-13.
7. LEVY D, LABIB SB, ANDERSON KM, CHRISTIANSEN JC, KANNEL WB, CASTELLI WP: Determinants of sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1990; 81: 815-820.
8. DANIELS SR, MEYER RA, LIANG Y.: Echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass index in normal children, adolescents, and young adults. JAm Coli Cardiol 1988; 12: 703-708 (1988).
9. GANONG WF.: Review of medical physiology, 6th ed. Los Altos, California : Lange Medical Publ., 1973: 200.
10. CASSEL DE; ZIEGLER·RF.: Electrocardiography in infants and children, 'New York: Grune & Stratton, 1966.
11. SAHN DJ, DEMARIA A, KISSLO J, WEYMAN A.-: The Committee on M-mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography: Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-1081.
12. DEVEREUX RB, ALONSO DR, LUTAS EM, GOTTLIEB GJ, CAMPO E, SACHS I, REiCHEK N.: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57:450-458.
13. DEVEREUX RB, CASALE PN, KLIGFIELD P, EISENBERG RR, MILLER D, CAMPO E, ALONSO DR.: Performance of primary and derived M-mode echocardiographic measurements for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in necropsied subjects and in patients with systemic hypertension, mitral regurgitation, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardioll986; 57: 1388-1393.
14. DEVEREUX RB.: Is the electrocardiogram still useful for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy? Circulation 1990; 81: ll44-1146.
15. DEVEREUX RB,: Left ventricular mass in children and adolescents. J Am Coli Cardiol 1988; 12: 709-711.
16. SNIDER AR, SERWER GA.: Echocardiography in pediatric heart disease, 1st ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publ., 1990: 80-81.
Published
2019-01-31
How to Cite
1.
Sastroasmoro S, Madiyono B, Oesman I. Sensitivity and Specificity of Electrocardiographic Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Children with Rheumatic Heart Disease. PI [Internet]. 31Jan.2019 [cited 20Apr.2024];31(9-10):233-4. Available from: https://paediatricaindonesiana.org/index.php/paediatrica-indonesiana/article/view/2127
Section
Pediatric Cardiology
Received 2019-01-31
Published 2019-01-31