Diagnostic Accuracy of CRP (C-Reactive Protein) Examination in Neonatal Infections

M. Sholeh Kosim; Bagus Ngurah Putu Arhana; Harry Mangunsong

doi:10.14238/pi33.7-8.1993.150-8

M. Sholeh Kosim Department of Child Health, Universitas Diponegoro Medical School/Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java
Bagus Ngurah Putu Arhana Department of Child Health, Universitas Diponegoro Medical School/Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java
Harry Mangunsong Department of Child Health, Universitas Diponegoro Medical School/Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Central Java

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14238/pi33.7-8.1993.150-8

Keywords: neonatal infection; CRP; c reactive protein; bacterial infection

Abstract

The incidence of neonatal infections has been still high in Indonesia. The main factors influencing success of treatment are early clinical diagnosis and rapid determination of the etiologic microorganisms. C-reactive protein (CRP) could be measured in the serum of baby suffering from bacterial infections. The aim of this study was to compare the capability of CRP examination in determining the diagnosis of neonatal infections, using blood culture examination as the gold standard. For comparison, white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts, which have been used as indicators of neonatal infections, were also evaluated. This study was done prospectively on 30 cases with suspected neonatal infections admitted to the High Risk Baby Ward, Division of Perinatology, and 30 normal babies as control, during the period of April to December 1990. CRP examination was done by latex agglutination method. The results of this study revealed that CRP examination has good sensitivity, specificity. and predictive values. CRP was also proved to be superior to WBC and platelet counts. CRP examination was also easy to perform, cheaper, and faster than blood culture examination. It is concluded that CRP examination could be used as the confirmatory tool in the diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infections.

References

1. Aminullah A. Sepsis pada bayi baru lahir. Berita Klinik 1980; 6:28-38.
2. Prasetyo A, Hariyanto. Beberapa aspek C-reaktif protein dan kegunaan kliniknya. Kumpulan Referat Patologi Klinik FK UNAIR Surabaya, 1981.
3. Peppys MB. C-reactive protein in fifty years on. Lancet 1981; i: 653-6.
4. Kosnadi L, Bahtera T, Adinoto S, Soemantri A, Subakir and Pradana AP. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis by buffy coat and peripheral blood examination. MKI1986; 12:535-41 .
5. Philip AGS and Hewitt JBS. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics 1980; 65:1036-41 .
6. Mclntosch K. Bacterial infections of the newborn. In: Scaffer's diseases of the newborn. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1984: 729-54.
7. Seibert K, Yu VYH, Doery JCG, Embury D. The value of C-reactive protein measurement in the diagnosis of neonatal infection. J Pediatr Child Health 1990; 26:267-70.
8. Kite P, Millar MR, Gorham P, Congdon P. Comparison of five tests used in diagnosis of neonatal bacteremia. Arch Dis Childh 1988; 63:639-43.
9. Faden HS. Early diagnosis of neonatal bacteremia by buffy coat examination. J Pediatr 1976; 88:1032-4.
10. Stuart J, IJVhicher JT. Test for detecting and monitoring the acute phase response. Arch Dis Childh 1988; 63:115-7.
11 . Ainbander E, Cobatu EE, Guznab DM, Sweet AY. Clinical and laboratory observations: Serum C-reactive protein and problems of newborn infants. J Pediatr 1982; 101:438-40.
12. Pettola H, Jaakkola M. C-reactive protein in early detection of bacteremia virsus viral infections in immunocompetent and compromised children. J Pediatr 1988; 113:641-6.