Effects of massage on behavior of full-term newborns

Tri Sunarti Wahyutami; Soedjatmiko Soedjatmiko; Agus Firmansyah; Rulina Suradi

doi:10.14238/pi50.4.2010.187-92

Tri Sunarti Wahyutami Department of Child Health, University of Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
Soedjatmiko Soedjatmiko Department of Child Health, University of Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
Agus Firmansyah Department of Child Health, University of Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
Rulina Suradi Department of Child Health, University of Indonesia Medical School/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14238/pi50.4.2010.187-92

Keywords: massage, behavior, Brazelton scale

Abstract

Background Baby massage is one of the touch stimulation that could be applied as soon as possible after birth. Giving massage regularly will affect the behavior of newborn.

Objectives To explore the effects of ten-day massage on infant's behavior.

Methods A randomized control trial was done from December 200S to March 2009. Full-term newborm were randomly assigned into massage group or control group. Babies in massage group were given massage by their mothers and supervised by midwives. All babies were evaluated twice, i.e., on day 1 and day 11, using Brazelton Scale (Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale). The behavior was compared between the two groups.

Results A total of 72 full-term newborn infants appropriate for gestational age were included in this study. Infants in the massage group sbowed significant difference in adaptive behavior compared to control group. Those adaptive behavior consisted of habituation (WMD 1.08 CI 95% 0.67 to 1.49, P<0.0001), social interaction (WMD 1.54 Cl 95% 1.23 to 1.84, P<0.0001), motor system (WMD 1.35 CI 95% 1.14 to 1.55, P<0.0001), organization state (P<0.0001), range of state (WMD 1.35 CI 95% 0.95 to 1.55, P< 0.0001), autonomic system (WMD 0.53 CI 95% 0.23 to 0.84, P<0.0001), end reflexes (P<0.0001).

Conclusions Massage gives better adaptive behavior and reflexes of full-term newborns compared to those without massage.

References

1. American Massage Therapy Association. AMTA definition of massage therapy [homepage on the internet]. [cited 2005 June 5]. Available from: http://w\vw.amtamassage.org.
2. Hoarth SB. Tbe skin as a neurodevelopmental interface. NeoReview.2001;2:292-301.
3. Needlman RD. Growth and Development. In : Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, editors. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 17th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 2004. p.23-66.
4. Livingston K, Beider S, Kant AJ, Gallardo CC, Joseph MH, Gold JI. Touch and massage for medically fragile infants. eCAM. 2007;1-10.
5. Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Diego M, Feijo L, Vera Y,Gil K. Massage therapy by parents improves early growth and development. Infant Behav & Dev. 2004;27:435-42.
6. Ferber SG, Kilint J, Weller A, Feldman R, Dollberg S, Arbel E, et al. Massage therapy by mothers and trained professionals enhances weight gain in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2002;67:17-45.
7. Vickers A, Ohlsson A, Lacy IB, Horsley A. Massage for promoting growth and development of preterm and/or low birth-weight infants. [Cochrane review]. The Cochrane collaboration. 2008:1-42.
8. Gallagher NO. Effects of infant massage on cognitive, motor and social-emotional functioning in high-risk infants. Bridges. 2003;1:1-11.
9, Roamet CT, Bryant DM, Suarez TM. Eady intervention: Why, for whom, how and at what cost? In: Lester BM, Tronick EZ, editors. Clinics in Perinatology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1990. P. 41-55.
10. History of massage. [homepage on the internet]. Cited on 2005 June 19. Available from http://.www.acupressorschool.com.
11. Field TM, Schanberg SM, Scafidi F, Bauer CR, Vega-Lahr N, Garcia R, et al. Tactile/kinestbetic stimulation effects on preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 1986;77:654-8.
12. Bond C. Positive touch and massage in the neonatal unit: a British approach. Semin Neonatal. 2002;7:477-86.
13, Black IE, Jennings VL, Aldridge GM, Greenough WT. The origins of behavior and cognition in the developing brain. In : Wolraich MW, Drotar DD, Dworkin PH, Perrin EC, editors. Developmental-behavioral pediatrics: evidence and practice. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2008. p.57-73.
14. Pollack M. Vision. In Pollack M, editor. Textbook of developmental pediatrics. 1st ed. U.SA: Churcill Livingstone, 1993. p.413-52.
15. Mustard JE. Early child development and the brain the base for health, learning, and behavior throughout life. In: Young ME, editor. From early child development to human development. 1st ed. The World Bank, 2002. p.32-62.
16. Perez H, Gewirtz J. Maternal touch effects on infant behaviour. In: Field T, editor. Touch and massage in early child development. 1st ed. Miami: Johnson & Johnson Ped. Institute LLC; 2004. p. 39-48.
17. Field TM. Stimulation of preterm infants. Pediatr Rev. 2003;24:4-11.
18. Field T. Touch therapy effects on development. Int J Bebav Dev. 1998;22:779-97.
19. Dieter IN, Field T, Hemandez-Reif M, Emory E K,Redzepi M. Stable preterm infants gain more weight and sleep less after five days of massage therapy. J of Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:403-11.
20. Ferber SG. Massage therapy by mother enhances the adjustment of cicardian rhytms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002;23:410-5.
21. Malekpour M. Low birth-weight infants and the importance of early intervention: enhancing mother-intant interactions a literature review. British J Dev Disab. 2004;5: 78-88.
22. Field T. Massage therapy. BMC Compl Altern Med. 2002;86:163-72.
23. Ferber SG, Field T. Massage therapy improves behavior in neonates born to l--IlV-positive mother. J Pediatr PsycboL 1996;21:889-97.
24. Field T, Hernandez-Reif; Diego M. Cortisol decreases and serotonin and dopamine increase following massage therapy.J Intern J Neurosci. 2005;115:1397-413.
25. Roesli U. Pedoman pijat bayi. 4th ed. Jakarta: Pustaka Pembangunan Swadaya Nusantara; 2004. p. 21-30.
26. Field T. Preterm infant massage therapy studies an American approach. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:487-94.
27. Naibaho JE. Pijat praktis untuk kesehatan. 1st ed. Jakarta: Ninnala; 2004. p. 32-40.
28. Mathai S, Fernandez A, Modkat J, Kanbur W. Effects of tactile-kinesthetic stimulation in preterms: a controlled trial. Indian Pediatrics. 2001; 38: l091-5.
29. Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal Behavioral Assesment Scale. In: Brazelton TB, editor. Neonatal Behavioral Assesment Scale. 3rd ed. London: Mac Keith Press; 1995. p.1-91.
30. Tronick EZ. The neonatal behavioral assessment scale as a biomarker of the effects of environmental agents on the newborn. Env Health Perspec. 1987;74:185-9.
31. Soedjatmiko. Stimulasi psikososial pada bayi risiko tinggi. In : Trihono P, Pudjiarto PS, Syarif DR, Hegar B, Gunardi H, Oswari H, et aI, editors. Hot topics in pediatrics II. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FKUI; 2002. p. 28A6.
32. Stack DM. Touch in labour pregnancy: clinical implications. In: Field T, editor. Touch and massage in early child development. 1st ed. Miami: Johnson & Johnson Ped. Institute LLC; 2004. p.51-87.
33. Leib SA, Benfield DG, Guidubaldi J. Effects of early intervention and stimulation on the preterm infant. Pediatrics. 1980;66:83-90.
34. Abrol P, Kapoor R, Garhwala G, Tiwari S, Tiwari AD. Neonatal behavior in full term small for date. lndian Pediatrics. 1994;31:785-9.
35. Canals J, Fernandez-BallartJ, Espan SG. Evolution of neonatal bebavior assessment scale scores in the first month of life. Infant Behav Dev. 2003;26: 223-37.
36. Boatella-Costa E, Costas-Moragas C, Boter-Mussons F, Fomieles-Dell A, de Caceres-Zurita ML. Bebavioral gender differences in the neonatal period according to the Brazelton scale. Early Human Dev, 2007; 83: 91-7.
37. Ferber SG, Makhoul IR. The effect of skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) shortly after birth on tbe neurobehavioml responses of the term newborn: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2004;113:858-65.
38. Mordein-Talbott MA, Harrison LL, Groer MW and Younger MS. The biobehavioral effects of gentle human touch on preterm infants. Nurs Sci Q. 2003;16:60-7.